- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 days ago by
Robert Oglesby DVM.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 19, 2025 at 10:12 am #22135
Robert Oglesby DVM
KeymasterEffect of pergolide treatment on insulin dysregulation in horses and ponies with pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction
Equine Vet J. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1111/evj.14468. Online ahead of print.
Authors
Nicolas C Galinelli 1 , Nicholas J Bamford 1 , Madison L Erdody 1 , Skye A Mackenzie 1 , Tobias Warnken 2 , Patricia A Harris 3 , Martin N Sillence 4 , Simon R Bailey 1
Affiliations1 Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
2 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
3 Equine Studies Group, Waltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray, UK.
4 School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.PMID: 39967360
DOI: 10.1111/evj.14468Abstract
Background: Due to the high frequency of laminitis reported for both conditions, the relationship between pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) and insulin dysregulation (ID), and the potential role of dopamine in modifying insulin secretion, requires further investigation.
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of pergolide mesylate on insulin sensitivity and postprandial insulin and glucose responses in horses and ponies with ID, both with or without concurrent PPID.
Study design: Randomised crossover study.
Methods: Sixteen horses and ponies, comprising eight matched pairs (PPID+ID or ID-only), were given pergolide mesylate at a dose of 2 μg/kg bwt orally once daily for 4 weeks (plus a 4-week non-treatment control period, with a 4-week washout between phases). A combined glucose and insulin tolerance test (CGIT) and a standard meal test (SMT; containing 1.1 g/kg bwt of starch and 0.1 g/kg bwt of free sugars), were performed before and after each treatment period to determine insulin sensitivity and postprandial insulin and glucose responses, respectively. Variables derived from the CGIT and SMT were analysed using linear mixed models.
Results: Pergolide treatment did not alter any of the variables derived from the CGIT in either the PPID+ID or ID-only groups (all p > 0.05). For the SMT, insulin responses were reduced by pergolide treatment for the PPID+ID group, with Δ change values for the total area under the curve for insulin over 300 mins (estimated marginal mean [95% confidence interval]) being -25.4 (-39.9 to -7.3) min∙mIU/mL (p = 0.03) and Δ change values for peak insulin concentration being -100 (-167 to -29) μIU/mL (p = 0.04). No effect of pergolide treatment was detected for the ID-only group.
Main limitations: Number of animals and heterogeneity among groups.
Conclusions: Pergolide had no effect on tissue insulin sensitivity. However, the results suggest that postprandial hyperinsulinaemia may be limited by this dopamine receptor agonist in animals with PPID plus ID.
Keywords: dopamine; endocrine; horse; hyperinsulinaemia; insulin resistance; laminitis.
© 2025 Boehringer Ingelheim, Mars Horsecare and The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.