Yearling laryngeal function grade and future performance

Yearling laryngeal function grades II.2 and below are not associated with reduced performance

Equine Vet J. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1111/evj.14452. Online ahead of print.
Authors
Josephine L Hardwick 1 2 , Benjamin J Ahern 3 , Kylie L Crawford 4 , Kate J Allen 5 , Brian H Anderson 6 , Kim J Rose 7 , Samantha H Franklin 1
Affiliations

1 School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
2 School of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
3 School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
4 Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
5 Bristol Veterinary School, Bristol University, Bristol, UK.
6 Ballarat Veterinary Practice, Lake Wendouree, Victoria, Australia.
7 Equine Sales Services, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

PMID: 39837796
DOI: 10.1111/evj.14452

Abstract

Background: The relationship between Thoroughbred yearling laryngeal function (YLF) grade and race performance is unclear.

Objectives: To determine the effect of YLF on future race performance.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Post-sale endoscopic recordings were reviewed from Australian yearling sales in 2018-2019. Race performance was evaluated for career and as 2-, 3- and ≥4-year-olds. Multivariable generalised linear modelling examined the association between YLF and performance, with risk estimates presented as coefficients (95% CI).

Results: The YLF in 5175 examinations was graded I in 29.8% (n = 1542); II.1 in 49.0% (n = 2537), II.2 in 16.5% (n = 855), III.1 in 3.9% (n = 200), III.2 in 0.8% (n = 39) and III.3 in <0.04% (n = 2). Additional endoscopic abnormalities included ventroaxial luxation of the corniculate process (VLAC, n = 77, 1.5%); arytenoid mucosal lesions (n = 392, 7.6%) and intermittent dorsal displacement of the soft palate (iDDSP, n = 1264, 24.4%). Median (IQR) career earnings were: grade I $45 095 ($15 565, $113 220); grade II.1 $45 315 ($15 915, $107 490), grade II.2 $38 610 ($14 326, $95 218), grade III.1 $32 765 ($8565, $86 030) and grade III.2 $35 810 ($3700, $65 770). There was no difference in career earnings for YLF grades II.2 and III.1, compared with referent grade I/II.1, whereas grade III.2 earned less overall (-$46 015 (95% CI: -$89 994, -$2036), p = 0.04). Earnings in ≥4-year-olds were less for grades III.1 (-$35 076 (-$56 129, -$14 024), p = 0.001) and III.2 (-$53 219, (-$76 062, -$30 375) p < 0.001).Main limitations: Lack of follow-up data due to retrospective nature of study. Exclusion of unraced horses and those with no prize money from analysis.Conclusions: Ninety-five percent of the yearling population had grades I, II.1 or II.2 YLF and minimal difference in race performance was identified between them. Horses with grade III.1 YLF performed similarly to grades I/II.1 in their early careers but had reduced race performance at ≥4-year-old.Keywords: RLN; horse; larynx; racehorse; sale; upper airway.© 2025 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.