- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 months ago by
Robert Oglesby DVM.
- AuthorPosts
- November 16, 2025 at 9:30 am #22586
Robert Oglesby DVMKeymasterRetrospective Analysis of Suspensory Ligament Branch Injuries in 70 Dressage Horses
Animals (Basel). 2025 Oct 23;15(21):3079. doi: 10.3390/ani15213079.
Authors
Ana Boado 1 2 , Danica Pollard 3 , Sue Dyson 4
Affiliations1 Independent Researcher, Avenida Salmoral 4, Manzanares el Real, 28492 Madrid, Spain.
2 Medicine and Surgery Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Av. Complutense, Moncloa-Aravaca, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
3 Independent Researcher, Rodham Road, Christchurch, Wisbech PE14 9NU, Cambridgeshire, UK.
4 Independent Researcher, Church Road, Market Weston, Diss IP22 2NX, Suffolk, UK.PMID: 41227410
PMCID: PMC12607962
DOI: 10.3390/ani15213079Abstract
There are no studies that have investigated factors influencing the outcome of dressage horses with suspensory ligament (SL) branch injuries. The aim was to determine if age, breed, work level, injury severity, anatomical localisation of injury, number of injured branches, periligamentous fibrosis, persistence of power Doppler signal or coexistent osteoarthritis of a metacarpophalangeal (MCP) or metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint influenced the prognosis of 70 dressage horses. Outcome was defined as good (return to pre-injury level of work or higher), poor (return to a lower level of work) or retirement. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to identify relationships between variables of interest and follow-up outcome. Follow-up outcome was good in 44/70 horses (62.9%), poor in 13/70 (18.6.%) and 13/70 horses (19.1%) were retired due to no response to treatment. Ultrasonographic lesion grade (p = 0.07), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the SL (p = 0.96), CSA of the lesion (p = 0.28) and the lesion CSA as a percentage of the SL CSA (p = 0.40) were not associated with outcome. Power Doppler signal was present in 75.8% of injured branches at the initial examination. The severity of power Doppler signal was not associated with outcome (p = 0.20); however, persistence of power Doppler signal was negatively associated with outcome (p < 0.001). Other variables did not influence the follow-up outcome. Early recognition of SL branch injury is likely to result in a more favourable outcome with appropriate treatment and management.Keywords: desmitis; fetlock; lameness; osteoarthritis; periligamentous fibrosis; power Doppler; radial pressure wave therapy; ultrasonography. Conflict of interest statementThe authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.